HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook x360 1030 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8637
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191009
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 14:37
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8665U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 139
54% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 75.1
8-Core 224
16% 149 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 8637) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 897
Write 605
Mixed 675
161% 726 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 30.3
107% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 199
157% 229 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix CCNNNCLGALAR-NVD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 0 13.3" 1280 720 IVO857A
Typical EliteBook x360 1030 G4 Builds (Compare 300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback