Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive396% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 176
2-Core 355
111% 208 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,314
119% 999 Pts
64-Core 2346
145% 2346 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 172
Parallax 163
149% 173 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 134
Splatting 116
115% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 480GB
159GB free
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 118 120 120 119 214 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 481
Write 452
Mixed 386
SusWrite 142
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 41.8
148% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 243
203% 291 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 95%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2019 1921 1930 1918 1951 1950 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
396% Outstanding
Read 2,584
Write 2,597
Mixed 2,415
SusWrite 1,948
537% 2,386 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 112
370% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,433
DQ Write 1179
DQ Mixed 1,298
974% 1,303 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 396%
Great: 526%
Nvme CT1000P 1TB
302GB free
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 1055 1074 1068 1081 1085 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,298
Write 1,100
Mixed 950
SusWrite 1,064
248% 1,103 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 85.9
299% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 274
326% 563 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 241%
Great: 299%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 169 168 168 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 188
Write 170
Mixed 116
SusWrite 168
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.1
65% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
286GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 157 162 156 160 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67% Good
Read 76.2
Write 99
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 157
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67%
Great: 106%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
268GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 126 125 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 94.7
Write 65.7
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 126
113% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 46.9
142% 49.8 GB/s
SC Read 32.3
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 43.1
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 133%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 29.5" 1280 720 AUS3031 XG309CM
Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback