Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 11:23
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 260
83% 155 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 824
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 155
Parallax 158
148% 165 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 89.3
Splatting 118
92% 112 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
537GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1257 1305 1335 1268 1287 1276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,775
Write 1,874
Mixed 1,437
SusWrite 1,288
359% 1,593 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55.9
180% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 1,023
DQ Mixed 1107
828% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 255%
Great: 355%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
863GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 160 165 160 164 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 178
Mixed 106
SusWrite 163
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD48GU881-32N220A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 28.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 21.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 46 60 31.5" 1280 720 LHC0315 X315 PRO
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback