Asrock H270M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H270M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 21:08
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 223
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 612
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 119
Parallax 126
108% 126 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 105
Splatting 88.9
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 20 20 5.6 4.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 4,588
Write 44
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 14.2
246% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 454
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 4.5
696% 154 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 368%
Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 53 101 58 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 473
Write 469
Mixed 393
SusWrite 56.8
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 45.3
161% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
870GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 17 19 33 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
718GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 70 56 76 22 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50% Average
Read 128
Write 154
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 45.9
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
223GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 24 25 21 9.9 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 40.2
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 21.7
44% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 19 60 23.8" 1920 1017 SAM1026 S24R65x
Typical H270M Pro4 Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H270M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $354
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback