Alienware x15 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware x15 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 03M3WT
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 15:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 63.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 317
92% 178 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,111
106% 875 Pts
64-Core 1,714
106% 1,714 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0B27) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 125
Parallax 28.1
19% 58.9 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 21.6
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG80ZNV1T02 KIOXIA 1024GB
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11304102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1739 1768 1666 1708 1478 1436 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,729
Write 1,724
Mixed 1,707
SusWrite 1,632
383% 1,698 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 56.8
187% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 534
389% 516 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 250%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
135% Outstanding
MC Read 58.9
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 49.7
152% 53 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 25.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 135%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0690
Typical x15 R2 Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Alienware x15 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback