Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 10:21
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 217
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 580
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 282
Parallax 181
140% 212 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 176
Splatting 124
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
616GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 359
Mixed 307
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 14.2
55% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 97.7
DQ Mixed 30.8
44% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 58%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: X6107000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 453
Write 421
Mixed 360
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 30.9
101% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 280
228% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 121%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
150GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 422
Write 340
Mixed 280
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 14.1
56% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 31
45% 83 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 58%
Seagate ST31000528ASQ 1TB
430GB free
Firmware: AP24
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 88.4
Mixed 60.2
62% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
136GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 73.7
Write 61.8
Mixed 43.2
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 53%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
247GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.7
Write 66.3
Mixed 31.9
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 1TB
230GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 116
Write 101
Mixed 17.4
89% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
430GB free, PID 2323
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.9
Write 96.5
Mixed 77.1
110% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 51%
SD Card 2GB
2GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.9
Write 10.5
Mixed 7.7
14% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.4% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 21.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 20.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 4 30 84.6" 1536 864 SAM0DF7 SAMSUNG
Typical SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 1 - $272

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $905
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback