Medion Erazer X5354 F/B764

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion Erazer X5354 F/B764  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 16:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 240
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 611
64% 513 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1492 MHz, MLim: 1827 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.4% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 87.1
Parallax 77.7
64% 80.9 fps
MRender 79.2
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 68
60% 74.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 775 351 367 372 371 309 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,877
Write 1,882
Mixed 1,695
SusWrite 424
329% 1,470 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65.5
222% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 790
602% 815 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 207%
Great: 271%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
224GB free
Firmware: GS2OA340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 116
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 104
60% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 11.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D44 C27F398
Typical Erazer X5354 F/B764 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Medion Erazer X5354 F/B764

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback