HP Laptop 14-dq1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 14-dq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C8
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230307
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 13:28
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 41
2-Core 78.3
36% 57.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 384
34% 289 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
HP(103C 86C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 10
6% 8.43 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 8.8
7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 1TB
510GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 13821
Mixed 652
1,506% 7,236 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 330
134% 323 MB/s
4K Write 55.3
88% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 21.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 25 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO733C
Typical Laptop 14-dq1xxx Builds (Compare 676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-dq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback