Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory41.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 04:11
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 221
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 367
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 124
Parallax 172
87% 134 fps
MRender 88.9
Gravity 119
Splatting 78.6
77% 95.4 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tecmiyo SATA SSD 480GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 704D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 261 270 370 373 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 374
Write 224
Mixed 215
SusWrite 317
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 7.7
68% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 12.5
51% 111 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 75%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
25GB free
Firmware: 71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 54 51 52 51 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 381
Write 335
Mixed 291
SusWrite 77.8
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 23.1
95% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 95.6
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 93.4
86% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 100%
Tecmiyo SATA SSD 480GB
437GB free
Firmware: 704D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 349 351 379 386 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 416
Write 345
Mixed 306
SusWrite 365
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 9.3
82% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 72.3
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 13.4
43% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 75%
Jmicron Tech 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 315 319 339 345 356 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 313
Write 306
Mixed 291
SusWrite 330
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 17.6
68% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 84
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 43.9
44% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 73%
SSD 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 213 225 282 295 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 300
Write 239
Mixed 194
SusWrite 258
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 8
52% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 76.6
DQ Mixed 15
32% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 85%
Tecmiyo SATA SSD 480GB
303GB free
Firmware: 4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 263 268 324 327 332 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 323
Write 288
Mixed 268
SusWrite 290
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 7.3
44% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 64.3
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 10.7
31% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 86%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
0GB free
Firmware: V0513A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,218
Write 981
Mixed 845
225% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 28.2
156% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 207
211% 328 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 230%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 112 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 111
Write 110
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 108
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 106 103 103 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 92.6
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 103
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 83%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
451GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 88 90 87 90 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 59.5
Write 26
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 84.2
45% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 60%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
621GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 144 134 131 131 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 137
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 135
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Adata DDR4 3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Adata DDR4 3200 48GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 31.8
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 23.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 18 50 27" 1280 720 ACI27C2 ASUS VG278HR
Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $827
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback