Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R940 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3358-A1
Memory	21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170120
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '17 at 14:06
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 160 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 512 51% 413 Pts	64-Core 1,223 76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 39.8 Parallax 36.5 33% 38.9 fps	MRender 50.8 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 39 34% 42 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512 512GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: 100Q Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 521 Write 137 Mixed 212 63% 290 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 23.4 96% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 74.6 95% 175 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 111%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$195 2,043 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4TB free Firmware: 1M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 109 (03) Spinup time 144 144 38684000723 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 193 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3173 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 110 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1155 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1155 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 223339348005 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	124% Outstanding	Read 218 Write 216 Mixed 189 156% 208 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 3.41 4K Mixed 0.65 173% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 121%
Seagate ST3000NM0033-9ZM178 3TB 1,501 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: SND3 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 160 Write 149 Mixed 160 118% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.42 126% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 102%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 40.4 Write 6.43 Mixed 8.72 17% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.35 50% 2.48 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G3A3 2x16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.9% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 11 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	5x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	4x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	2x

RAM
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	7x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	3x
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G 24GBUnknownBench 54%, 9 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48