MSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D15
MotherboardMSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220523
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 15:34
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 277
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 809
84% 675 Pts
64-Core 974
60% 974 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.1% Above average
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 72
62% 74.2 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 55
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 220 185 162 148 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,436
Write 914
Mixed 956
SusWrite 197
194% 876 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 71.3
261% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 574
490% 711 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 184%
Great: 199%
SKHynix_HFS512GDE9X081N 512GB
373GB free
Firmware: 41730C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2162 1119 833 834 825 863 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2599
Write 1,981
Mixed 1,745
SusWrite 1,106
415% 1,858 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 69.4
222% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,319
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 1,179
892% 1,202 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 295%
Great: 328%
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
451GB free
Firmware: MU2OA720
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 135 136 136 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 127
Write 128
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 138
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76%
Great: 85%
WD WD1200BJKT-75F4T0 120GB
82GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 61 62 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 61.9
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 61.6
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELD07A DELL S2216H
Typical MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15) Builds (Compare 3,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback