Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 11:53
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 95.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 468
51% 406 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Nvidia(10DE 1087) 1GB
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 544 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.7
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lite-on IT CORP. 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 400 298 170 183 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 346
Write 396
Mixed 326
SusWrite 270
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 29.8
101% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 96.7
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 139
121% 173 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 80%
Hitachi HCC543232A7A380 320GB
291GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 72 73 71 73 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 70
Write 69.3
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 70.2
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1800, 1800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 22.3
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 19" 1280 720 HWP3022 HP LA1956x
Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback