Toshiba Satellite P755

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite P755  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PEQAA
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 08:40
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 111
49% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 137
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FC31) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-minder(s) 240G 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 72 7 6.9 105 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 410
Write 188
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 34.1
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 8.3
49% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
462GB free
Firmware: LVD3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 104 105 106 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 830B M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 35 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO22EC
Typical Satellite P755 Builds (Compare 207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback