Illegear ARTE 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIllegear ARTE 14  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 06:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48% Average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 131
49% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 298
33% 259 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 48%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 114B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
6.71% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 7.2
8% 7.9 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
698GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1787 1816 1807 1884 1952 1965 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,767
Write 1,935
Mixed 1,120
SusWrite 1,869
377% 1,673 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 56.8
197% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 794
587% 777 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 280%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 16G3200CL22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 11.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 90 14" 1920 1200 CSO1402
Typical ARTE 14 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Illegear ARTE 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback