Medion E7222

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMedion E7222  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion E7222
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120413
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 17:14
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 141
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 185
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1B0A 20C5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 226 230 225 233 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.3% Good
Read 256
Write 231
Mixed 238
SusWrite 223
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 21.6
101% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 34.6
63% 123 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL11-4GBSQ Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO149E
Typical E7222 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E7222

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback