Acer Aspire 8935G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 8935G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer SM80-MV
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110427
Uptime19 Days
Run DateDec 18 '17 at 07:49
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6500
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 67
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 57.8
36% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 59.1
8-Core 58.2
8% 58.7 Pts
64-Core 59
4% 59 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Acer(1025 019F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 3.31
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 6.87
4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.4% Above average
Read 259
Write 207
Mixed 143
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 29.8
96% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 46.8
48% 79 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
86GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 45.8
Mixed 32.7
31% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.27
64% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 8935G Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 8935G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback