Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H V3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M S2H V3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210524
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 23:31
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 237
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 532
60% 467 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 39.8
35% 41.6 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 28
29% 36 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1106A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 91 174 126 90 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,353
Write 171
Mixed 888
SusWrite 126
139% 634 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 23.8
138% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 20.3
149% 369 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 126%
Great: 234%
Netac 240GB 240GB
10GB free
Firmware: VA001C81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 413
Mixed 353
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 32.4
111% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 220
168% 223 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 93%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
409GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 91 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 85.1
Write 76.3
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 90.5
55% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 DDR4 3200 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 22
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 10 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D1A S22F350
Typical GA-H410M S2H V3 Builds (Compare 2,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback