Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 7483WGG (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '16 at 21:15
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$53 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 77 1-Core 42 2-Core 63.4 42% 60.8 Pts	4-Core 71.8 8-Core 75.7 10% 73.8 Pts	64-Core 81.8 5% 81.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 16,152 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 3048) 2.5GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.58 Parallax 0.62 1% 0.63 fps	MRender 0.52 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.91 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 10216218 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 14525579396215 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3415 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1756 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 39 67 77313802279 (C2) HDA temperature 39 67 77313802279 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 10216218 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 10216218 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 10216218 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1673 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1727 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1727 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4397	37.4% Below average	Read 183 Write 97.4 Mixed 116 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 11.5 68% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 94 DQ Write 93.6 DQ Mixed 25 38% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 73%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 321GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 26.5 Mixed 13.5 28% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 286 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 162f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	9.61% Terrible	Read 29 Write 11.8 Mixed 13.9 20% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.58 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.39 50% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.61% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Lenovo 7483WGG

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)