Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro AS -2123BT-HTR-17-AT059 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro H11DST-B
Memory	121.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '23 at 09:18
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7301 16-Core 20 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 54.3 1-Core 35.1 2-Core 67 34% 52.1 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 363 28% 249 Pts	64-Core 2,690 166% 2,690 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 69%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM1T9HMJP-00003 2TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: GXT50F3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 341 334 341 334 335 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 426 Write 416 Mixed 342 SusWrite 339 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 33.7 113% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 272 204% 270 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 8x16GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 29.3 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 16.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 128%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	17	0	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16