Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO690
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 07:33
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 73.3
1-Core 186
2-Core 314
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 809
82% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,361
84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 3006) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 11.7
8% 14.5 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid SAMSUNG MZVL21T0 1TB
771GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1473 1564 1319 1412 1459 2554 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,324
Write 1,391
Mixed 1,291
SusWrite 1,630
319% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 29.7
80% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 741
DQ Write 861
DQ Mixed 845
624% 816 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 214%
Great: 393%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG MZVL21T0 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: GXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3044 2983 3052 3216 3197 3036 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 1,296
Write 1568
Mixed 1,240
SusWrite 3088
409% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 17.8
62% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 695
DQ Write 1,185
DQ Mixed 1,157
816% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 301%
Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 60
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 64.1
181% 63.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 27.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 160%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 16" 1536 960 BOE0B90
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback