HP 500-303nc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP 500-303nc  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '23 at 21:10
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 39.7
1-Core 20.8
2-Core 33.8
22% 31.4 Pts
4-Core 48.8
8-Core 52.3
7% 50.5 Pts
64-Core 53
3% 53 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.30
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 30.8
25% 31 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 22.1
24% 30 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 64 70 65 72 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 109
Write 97.4
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 68.1
21% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 11.1
39% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 84.9
68% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 148 145 148 159 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 155
Write 141
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 155
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 5.9
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 47 30 65" 1707 960 PHL04C3 Philips FTV
Typical 500-303nc Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-303nc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $96
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback