Dell Precision M6600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemDell Precision M6600  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 04YY4M
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '23 at 14:49
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 124
54% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 286
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 3000M
Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 6.5
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 6.6
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 404 393 447 461 462 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 441
Write 463
Mixed 306
SusWrite 421
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 31.6
102% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 139
140% 226 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 17.2" 1280 720 AUO129E
Typical Precision M6600 Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback