Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 183
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 343
39% 306 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1391) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 6.3
5% 6.4 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.7
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1391) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 54.5
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 45.3
44% 51.6 fps
MRender 52.6
Gravity 43
Splatting 49.9
40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 213 213 164 157 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 645
Write 623
Mixed 668
SusWrite 212
121% 537 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 33.4
108% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 392
297% 403 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 126%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 378 358 338 362 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 474
Write 410
Mixed 378
SusWrite 358
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 33.3
110% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 262
210% 296 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 15.5" 2560 1440 AUO61ED
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback