Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B809C3757DA9BB8D
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$133
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 436
58% 435 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M395
Apple(106B 014C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2001.0
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.7% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 38
Parallax 44.6
27% 38.6 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 26
26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0128G PCIe 121GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW5TA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 648 633 632 636 637 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,298
Write 648
Mixed 672
SusWrite 636
181% 814 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 30.2
103% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 393
304% 427 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 143%
Great: 220%
Apple HDD ST2000DM001 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: AQ03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 152 152 153 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 118
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 151
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314739453220 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 23.4
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.7" 1280 720 APPAE06 iMac
Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback