Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 04:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$183
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.9 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 162
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 454
46% 370 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 135
Parallax 89.2
78% 107 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 84.6
Splatting 77.2
73% 91 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 987 1015 1000 1027 1027 1033 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,308
Write 1,072
Mixed 1,120
SusWrite 1,015
254% 1,129 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 64.7
204% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 337
251% 334 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 193%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 23.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 16
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 56% 32 164 136 144 31.5" 2560 1440 GSM778B LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $436
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback