Lenovo 82EY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82EY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime23.5 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 20:58
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 224
66% 123 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 574
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Legend(17AA 3A45) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.4% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 48.7
Parallax 42.9
36% 45.4 fps
MRender 52.5
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 40.7
36% 44.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8L 512GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C04C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 101 56 55 57 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 839
Write 814
Mixed 760
SusWrite 105
141% 630 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 45.2
150% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 342
284% 400 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 106%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 25.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 14 195 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0A01
Typical 82EY Builds (Compare 2,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82EY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback