Asrock H510M-HVS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 15:59
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 220
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 554
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3128GNTD 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 145 126 104 101 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 547
Write 152
Mixed 213
SusWrite 111
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 31.7
137% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 183
140% 192 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 184%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
201GB free
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 69 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 55.9
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 66.3
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 2666 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 25.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 25.5
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 0" 1680 1050
Typical H510M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback