Exertis_captech Z270P-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemExertis_captech Z270P-D3  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z270P-D3-CF
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 14:49
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$233
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 229
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 527
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 136
Parallax 126
101% 129 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 129
Splatting 114
97% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,791
Write 1,295
Mixed 537
265% 1,208 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 42.2
173% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 760
584% 803 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 419 442 467 358 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 444
Mixed 384
SusWrite 371
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 45.8
152% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
764GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 148 147 119 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 87
SusWrite 132
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACI249A ASUS VS247
Typical Z270P-D3 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Exertis_captech Z270P-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $496
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback