Alaska KN12A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive7.34% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlaska KN12A  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 12:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3867U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12% Very poor
Memory 13.4
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 42.8
20% 34.4 Pts
4-Core 60.1
8-Core 65.3
8% 62.7 Pts
64-Core 72.5
4% 72.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 12%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Device(1E50 8005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 0.2
2% 1.67 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ShanDianZhe-512GB 512GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 144 7.2 36 108 8.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.34% Terrible
Read 51.3
Write 230
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 60.5
20% 89 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.3
6% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 7.34%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.1
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 373
11% 373 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 2% 46 46 28 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0812
Typical KN12A Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska KN12A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback