Supermicro X7DCL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemSupermicro X7DCL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X7DCL
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080818
Uptime16.8 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 11:38
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5430
LGA771, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 84.6
43% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 320
29% 245 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Nvidia(10DE 0828) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 1.9
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.6
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 62 47 50 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 219
Write 193
Mixed 196
SusWrite 92.5
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 17.2
83% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 20.4
26% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
223GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 77 84 82 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 31
Write 67.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 82.2
38% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
121GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 163 164 163 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 141
Write 133
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 164
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 104 105 105 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 105
Write 96.2
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 104
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 28.9" 1280 720 PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV
Typical X7DCL Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X7DCL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback