Asus P7H55

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '23 at 09:26
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3450 3,425 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 83.9 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 89.9 50% 74.9 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 140 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 43.6 Reflection 35.9 Parallax 55 36% 44.8 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 43.7 Splatting 25 27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 91 4 62 49 29 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.9% Poor	Read 196 Write 164 Mixed 99.7 SusWrite 57.6 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 12.2 45% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 96.3 DQ Write 66.4 DQ Mixed 33.7 38% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 56%
Hua721010kla330 44X2459 42C0424IBM 1TB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 542GB free Firmware: GKAOAB4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 80 78 79 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 65.4 Write 66.3 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 78.5 47% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 47%
Hua721010kla330 44X2459 42C0424IBM 1TB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 644GB free Firmware: GKAOAB4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 78 78 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 72.4 Write 77 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 77.4 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 47%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 532GB free Firmware: AX003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 82 83 83 86 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 82 Write 79.1 Mixed 32 SusWrite 81 50% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 336GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 62 66 62 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 60.7 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 62.8 42% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	35% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 12.5 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 9.2 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	12	60	23"	1920 1017	ACR00A0 Acer H233H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55 Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	52x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	50x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	43x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	15x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	111x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	58x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16