Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE (all builds)
Memory	29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '17 at 17:57
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 150 2-Core 302 101% 183 Pts	4-Core 604 8-Core 1,018 99% 811 Pts	64-Core 1,274 79% 1,274 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Lighting 48.2 Reflection 45 Parallax 40.1 39% 44.5 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 36.1 31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 233GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2608 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1945 (B1) Unknown 98 98 30 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 54 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 209 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17429945514	116% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 404 Mixed 418 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 51.8 180% 66.7 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 124 151% 267 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 124%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$4 3,426 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 1,862 Write 924 Mixed 1,238 296% 1,341 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 83.7 4K Mixed 55 158% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 615 DQ Write 498 DQ Mixed 239 266% 451 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 219%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 8 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3011 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 8643766787 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9209 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2732 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 8590131334 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 39 2654795071518 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 795 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3211 (C2) HDA temperature 30 61 -140737488355298 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 6 8 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 196 82 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 45307610014779 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1764420585 (F2) Unknown 100 253 780316809	44% Average	Read 77.4 Write 76.2 Mixed 74.6 57% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.44 85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 252GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 183 1675 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 782 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3259 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 275 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 194 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1633 (C2) HDA temperature 123 94 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	34.9% Below average	Read 63.8 Write 57.6 Mixed 52.4 44% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.33 89% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 41%
Mass Storage Device 2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 125b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Read 9.77 Write 6.26 Mixed 7.44 10% 7.82 MB/s	4K Read 3.47 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 14% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB 3,364 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 33.1 108% 37.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 45.8 SC Mixed 35.3 100% 34.9 GB/s	Latency 50.3 80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	685x
Core i7-8086KIntel $443Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	166x
Core i9-9900KIntel $429Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	134x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	225x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	109x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	83x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	82x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $145Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	74x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	97x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $861

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16