Gmktec NucBox K1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemGmktec NucBox K1  (all builds)
MotherboardGMKtec GMKtec
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230404
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 04:00
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 169
2-Core 328
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 933
96% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,229
76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 66
30% 48.3 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 25.5
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 512GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9256
SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 739 774 800 694 801 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1246
Write 804
Mixed 621
SusWrite 754
191% 856 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 52.2
188% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 438
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 387
351% 524 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 180%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5S480016G-B 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 22.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 24.1" 1280 720 ACI24D1 VS24A
Typical NucBox K1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Gmktec NucBox K1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback