Lenovo 80T2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80T2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171018
Uptime28 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 03:46
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 130
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 142
22% 158 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 5.7
5% 4.87 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.2
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramos 2.5 inch SATA 256GB SSD
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1220B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 309 330 287 305 315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 391
Write 351
Mixed 321
SusWrite 302
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 15.2
74% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 60
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 40.6
69% 126 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Z-2G3B1 1B Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 13.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 24 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14C3
Typical 80T2 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80T2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback