Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 19:34
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 216
70% 129 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 692
68% 558 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 84.4
Reflection 134
Parallax 172
69% 130 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 152
116% 141 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 158 127 46 77 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 461
Write 233
Mixed 331
SusWrite 115
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 0.9
58% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 185
157% 226 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 95%
RX7 2.5 120GB
39GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 57 5.1 22 20 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 488
Write 361
Mixed 38
SusWrite 30.3
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 8.3
71% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 10.9
40% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 75%
Midasfor ce SSD 512GB
122GB free
Firmware: V090
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 69 76 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 386
Write 123
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 76.1
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 1.8
49% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 89.3
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 1.7
21% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 59%
VRX M.2 NVME 2280 1TB
606GB free
Firmware: APF1M3R0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 82 1023 82 535 285 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,239
Write 2,136
Mixed 1,540
SusWrite 548
309% 1,366 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 54.8
201% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 670
DQ Mixed 878
636% 828 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 180%
Great: 329%
WD Elements 10B8 750GB
351GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 50.4
Write 36.2
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 35.7
48% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 26.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 11 30 23.8" 1920 1080 GSM5BB1 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,046
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback