Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive9.22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506II
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 16:11
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 266
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 787
80% 648 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 81 24 9 166 25 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.22% Terrible
Read 35.3
Write 9.8
Mixed 32
SusWrite 115
11% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
2% 1 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 9.22%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-035.A00G Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.1% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 21
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 197 59 144 0" 1536 864
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback