Gigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 328%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 395%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics314% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive472% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 15:37
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 178
2-Core 354
109% 206 Pts
4-Core 700
8-Core 1,349
122% 1,025 Pts
64-Core 2,830
175% 2,830 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 88BF) ≥ 4GB; ASUS STRIX RTX4080 OC 16GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Lighting 481
Reflection 443
Parallax 518
392% 481 fps
MRender 568
Gravity 379
Splatting 274
318% 407 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 314%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4462 2577 2792 2802 2866 2812 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
472% Outstanding
Read 2,682
Write 4,693
Mixed 3,366
SusWrite 3052
783% 3,448 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 243
4K Mixed 113
380% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,482
DQ Write 1219
DQ Mixed 1,502
1,083% 1,401 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 472%
Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z4600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 87.1
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 34.7
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 33.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 137%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical GA-X570S GAMING X Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback