Asrock J4205-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock J4205-ITX  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170714
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 17 '17 at 15:49
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J4205
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 96.8
38% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 195
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
ASRock(1849 5A84) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 3.44
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 446
Write 185
Mixed 218
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 5.9
43% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 53.4
DQ Mixed 2.95
11% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 82%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
67GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 129
Write 64
Mixed 87.3
109% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.86
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.76
95% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4205-ITX Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4205-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback