MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 06:36
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 169
2-Core 338
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 969
97% 787 Pts
64-Core 1130
70% 1130 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 220 122 198 132 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 432
Mixed 316
SusWrite 172
79% 356 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 52.2
183% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 237
206% 308 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
253GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 423 432 429 416 410 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 491
Mixed 397
SusWrite 423
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.8
219% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
281% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
59GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 50 51 49 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$84
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 155 153 156 149 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 94.4
Write 107
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 152
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
173GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 121 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 121
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 109%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
57GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 24 26 24 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 163
Write 50.8
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 36.6
87% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.6
136% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 40.6
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 34.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 42
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 108%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 26 144 0" 1280 720
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback