MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 21:31
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 171
2-Core 338
103% 195 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 938
99% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 69.6
60% 73.1 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 68.2
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDS2500GB 500GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0818A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 8 193 17 17 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 515
Write 421
Mixed 418
SusWrite 97.8
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 30.1
136% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 44.6
84% 159 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 96%
SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: 41710C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2212 502 480 471 479 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,844
Write 1,650
Mixed 1,593
SusWrite 771
380% 1,714 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 93.9
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,301
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 1,200
907% 1,218 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 316%
Great: 312%
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 680 677 680 679 680 680 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 797
Write 689
Mixed 640
SusWrite 680
158% 701 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 78.7
270% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 264
279% 463 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 182%
Great: 247%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 130
Write 110
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 104
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 88%
Wl4000gsa6472 1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 163 162 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 147
Write 174
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 161
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 26
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 27.5
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 0 49.5" 1280 720 VIZ1004 E50-C1
Typical B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 6,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback