Hasee NBxxTA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHasee NBxxTA  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NBxxTA
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190927
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 14:04
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 671
73% 577 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 50C1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5720
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 50.5
46% 56.4 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 49
39% 46.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD HEORIADY M.2 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0411A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 387 389 432 439 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 461
Write 366
Mixed 384
SusWrite 412
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 17.2
96% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 32.6
78% 156 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 5R 8G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 20% 66 211 60 60 16" 1280 720 CMN1603
Typical NBxxTA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Hasee NBxxTA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback