HP 20-c013w

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	HP 20-c013w (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81BB
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210826
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '23 at 03:26
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	86%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3060 2,183 User benchmarks, average bench 22% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.64% Terrible	Memory 15.5 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 18.2 11% 16.4 Pts	4-Core 22.1 8-Core 23.9 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 22.9 1% 22.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.64% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 81BB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 786GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 129 160 111 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 328 Write 263 Mixed 298 SusWrite 144 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 11.2 4K Mixed 7.7 38% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 54.6 DQ Write 44.5 DQ Mixed 48.2 36% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 137%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 2TB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1TB free, PID 9210 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 33.4 Write 34 Mixed 33.1 43% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 8 445% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 78%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 116GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 27.9 Write 25 Mixed 23.8 32% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 46% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB 5,265 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.55% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.53 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 355 11% 355 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 7.55% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	33	22	60	19.4"	1280 720	HWP4245 HP ALL-in-One

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20-c013w Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP 20-c013w

CPU
Celeron J3060IntelBench 22%, 2,183 samples	13x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
CS900 1TB SSDPNYBench 78%, 7,281 samples	1x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	3x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	2x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16