Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 22:40
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 179
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 425
45% 361 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.5% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 87.6
49% 69.5 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 46.6
48% 60.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 18 4.5 20 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 558
Write 11.2
Mixed 233
SusWrite 16.2
44% 205 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 21.6" 1280 720 GSM56FE W2243
Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 1,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback