HP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop GT21-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 346%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 395%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics287% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive367% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop GT21-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A96
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 21:59
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 231
2-Core 466
131% 258 Pts
4-Core 932
8-Core 1,529
150% 1,230 Pts
64-Core 2,920
181% 2,920 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 126%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
HP(103C 8B69) ≥ 4GB; HP-OMEN
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5700 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
287% Outstanding
Lighting 416
Reflection 449
Parallax 531
339% 465 fps
MRender 566
Gravity 392
Splatting 279
322% 412 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 287%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRZ-2T00-1106 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2368 2475 2574 2654 2604 2627 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 2,849
Write 2,373
Mixed 2,022
SusWrite 2,550
550% 2,449 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 57.1
196% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,168
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 998
692% 881 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 367%
Great: 564%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT343.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1751 1900 1848 1407 975 1010 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,368
Write 1,759
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 1,482
344% 1,520 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 65.2
224% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,127
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 971
673% 854 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 250%
Great: 303%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 37 39 37 161 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 438
Write 382
Mixed 348
SusWrite 89
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 20
95% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 28.9
71% 145 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
439GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 397 375 221 218 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 427
Write 388
Mixed 306
SusWrite 303
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 33.3
115% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 252
207% 297 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
938GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 148 148 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 143
Write 147
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 148
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP52U40S8HM-16FRA 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 66.3
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 58.8
179% 62.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 28
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 126%
This bench: 160%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 51 60 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F3 DELL S3220DGF
Typical OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop GT21-1xxx Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop GT21-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,093
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback