Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 21:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 129
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 197
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Acer(1025 1094) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 11.6
10% 11.4 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 8.7
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TNF-N3A0A 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 267 232 234 239 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 397
Write 398
Mixed 371
SusWrite 251
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 29.3
97% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 315
240% 324 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA425S6AFR6N-UH Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 6GB
2133, 2133 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO70EC
Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback