IBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]-

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00MV214
Memory187.1 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 11:45
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 172
58% 105 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 694
60% 512 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.6% Average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 74.2
49% 67.4 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 50
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 3TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1050 1025 1025 1032 1015 1040 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
290% Outstanding
Read 3,063
Write 3,173
Mixed 2,512
SusWrite 1,031
548% 2,445 MB/s
4K Read 85.1
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 87.3
294% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 285
215% 286 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 290%
Great: 244%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 599GB
549GB free
Firmware: 3.34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 144 135 136 136 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.9% Poor
Read 290
Write 163
Mixed 117
SusWrite 134
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 0.6
16% 7.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 11.9
10% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 432%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD M393B2G70DB0-CMA Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70EB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70... 192GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 39.8
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.9
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24.1" 1280 720 LCD0000 KVM Monitor
Typical System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]- Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: IBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $4,000
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback