Megaport MS-7C51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMegaport MS-7C51  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 08:43
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 734
78% 622 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.8% Very good
Lighting 88.4
Reflection 128
Parallax 83.5
72% 99.9 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 71.7
68% 85.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 339 335 286 38 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 378
Write 335
Mixed 317
SusWrite 229
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 31
118% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 176
133% 175 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 188 185 187 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 173
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 187
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA266.M8FB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 31 144 23.5" 1280 720 VSC0437 VX2458-mhd
Typical MS-7C51 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: Megaport MS-7C51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback