Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 22:02
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 66.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 299
87% 168 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 830
88% 703 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 155
Parallax 175
135% 165 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 134
Splatting 121
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV5002 240GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 88 116 111 95 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 322
Write 306
Mixed 279
SusWrite 135
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 13.6
45% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 136
119% 176 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 86%
Corsair Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$75
14GB free
Firmware: E8FM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 637
Write 377
Mixed 435
107% 483 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 35.1
132% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 324
265% 373 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
734GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 194 198 202 197 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 77.8
Write 136
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 195
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 106%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
412GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 77 77 75 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 71.1
Write 74
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 75
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GISB CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 F4-3000C16-8GISB F4-3200C16-4GVKB 28GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.7% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 24.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 24.8
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 27" 1280 720 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 2,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback