HP EliteBook 850 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828C
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170712
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 17 '17 at 04:20
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 165
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 240
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 828C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 5.43
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 5.25
4% 6.25 fps
MRender 7.71
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 10.7
7% 7.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,763
Write 1,152
Mixed 1,299
311% 1,405 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 32.3
166% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 56.3
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 29.6
38% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 194%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 25
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 21.7
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G4 Builds (Compare 357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback