HP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8768
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 08:36
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 231
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 742
72% 591 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
HP(103C 12BC) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.25
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 27
Parallax 19.8
18% 23 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 21.8
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B2T6TB Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 553 558 562 549 555 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,074
Write 1,620
Mixed 1,260
SusWrite 578
308% 1,383 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 63.8
215% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 943
DQ Write 1,035
DQ Mixed 849
678% 942 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 229%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Sries 8502 3200 C16 Series 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.6% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 19.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback